Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Payment of Gratuity_Practical Problems_2
Industrial Dispute Act_Practical Problems_3
Sameer died suddenly while working in a factory. The workmen refused to resume work to express solidarity with the deceased worker. Does the action of the workmen amount to strike under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ?
Industrial Dispute Act_Practical Problems_2
Monday, January 26, 2009
Right to Information Act_15
Every PIO will be liable for fine of Rs. 250 per day, up to a maximum of Rs. 25,000/-, for -
i. not accepting an application;
ii. delaying information release without reasonable cause;
iii. malafidely denying information;
iv. knowingly giving incomplete, incorrect, misleading information;
v. destroying information that has been requested and
vi. obstructing furnishing of information in any manner.
The Information Commission (IC) at the Centre and the State levels will have the power to impose this penalty. The Information Commission can also recommend disciplinary action for violation of the law against an erring PIO. (S.20)
Right to Information Act_14
Second Appeal: Second appeal to the Central Information Commission or the State Information Commission as the case may be, within 90 days of the date on which the decision was given or should have been made by the First Appellate Authority. (delay may be condoned by the Commission if sufficient cause is shown).
Third Party appeal against PIO's decision must be filed within 30 days before first Appellate Authority; and, within 90 days of the decision on the first appeal, before the appropriate Information Commission which is the second appellate authority.
Burden of proving that denial of Information was justified lies with the PIO.
First Appeal shall be disposed of within 30 days from the date of its receipt. Period extendable by 15 days if necessary. (S.19)
Right to Information Act_13
If it infringes copyright of any person other than the State. (S.9)
Right to Information Act_12
48 hours for information concerning the life and liberty of a person
5 days shall be added to the above response time, in case the application for information is given to Assistant Public Information Officer.
If the interests of a third party are involved then time limit will be 40 days (maximum period + time given to the party to make representation).
Failure to provide information within the specified period is a deemed refusal.
Right to Information Act_11
Apply in writing or through electronic means in English or Hindi or in the official language of the area, to the PIO, specifying the particulars of the information sought for.
Reason for seeking information are not required to be given;
Pay fees as may be prescribed (if not belonging to the below poverty line category).
Right to Information Act_10
If the information requested for is held by or its subject matter is closely connected with the function of another public authority, the PIO shall transfer, within 5 days, the request to that other public authority and inform the applicant immediately.
PIO may seek the assistance of any other officer for the proper discharge of his/her duties.
PIO, on receipt of a request, shall as expeditiously as possible, and in any case within 30 days of the receipt of the request, either provide the information on payment of such fee as may be prescribed or reject the request for any of the reasons specified in S.8 or S.9.
Where the information requested for concerns the life or liberty of a person, the same shall be provided within forty-eight hours of the receipt of the request.
If the PIO fails to give decision on the request within the period specified, he shall be deemed to have refused the request.
Where a request has been rejected, the PIO shall communicate to the requester - (i) the reasons for such rejection, (ii) the period within which an appeal against such rejection may be preferred, and (iii) the particulars of the Appellate Authority.
PIO shall provide information in the form in which it is sought unless it would disproportionately divert the resources of the Public Authority or would be detrimental to the safety or preservation of the record in question.
a. that only part of the record requested, after severance of the record containing information which is exempt from disclosure, is being provided;
b. the reasons for the decision, including any findings on any material question of fact, referring to the material on which those findings were based;
c. the name and designation of the person giving the decision;
d. the details of the fees calculated by him or her and the amount of fee which the applicant is required to deposit; and
e. his or her rights with respect to review of the decision regarding non-disclosure of part of the information, the amount of fee charged or the form of access provided.
· If information sought has been supplied by third party or is treated as confidential by that third party, the PIO shall give a written notice to the third party within 5 days from the receipt of the request and take its representation into consideration.
· Third party must be given a chance to make a representation before the PIO within 10 days from the date of receipt of such notice.
Right to Information Act_9
PIOs are officers designated by the public authorities in all administrative units or offices under it to provide information to the citizens requesting for information under the Act. Any officer, whose assistance has been sought by the PIO for the proper discharge of his or her duties, shall render all assistance and for the purpose of contraventions of the provisions of this Act, such other officer shall be treated as a PIO
Right to Information Act_8
A third party means a person other than the citizen making a request for information and includes a public authority. Third parties have a right to be heard in respect of applications and appeals dealing with information submitted by them to the Government in confidence.
Right to Information Act_7
Central Intelligence and Security agencies specified in the Second Schedule like IB, R&AW, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, Directorate of Enforcement, Narcotics Control Bureau, Aviation Research Centre, Special Frontier Force, BSF, CRPF, ITBP, CISF, NSG, Assam Rifles, Special Service Bureau, Special Branch (CID), Andaman and Nicobar, The Crime Branch-CID-CB, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Special Branch, Lakshadweep Police. Agencies specified by the State Governments through a Notification will also be excluded. The exclusion, however, is not absolute and these organizations have an obligation to provide information pertaining to allegations of corruption and human rights violations. Further, information relating to allegations of human rights valuations could be given but only with the approval of the Central or State Information Commission, as the case may be. [S.24)]
Right to Information Act_6
· by or under the Constitution;
· by any other law made by Parliament;
· by any other law made by State Legislature;
· by notification issued or order made by the appropriate Government.and includes any-
a. body owned, controlled or substantially financed
b. non-Government organization substantially financed directly or indirectly by the appropriate Government.
Right to Information Act_5
Right to Information Act_4
information which has been expressly forbidden to be published by any court of law or tribunal or the disclosure of which may constitute contempt of court;
information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of privilege of Parliament or the State Legislature;
information including commercial confidence, trade secrets or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would harm the competitive position of a third party, unless the competent authority is satisfied that larger public interest warrants the disclosure of such information;
information available to a person in his fiduciary relationship, unless the competent authority is satisfied that the larger public interest warrants the disclosure of such information;
information received in confidence from foreign Government;
information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes;
information which would impede the process of investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders;
cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers;
information which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual;
Notwithstanding any of the exemptions listed above, a public authority may allow access to information, if public interest in disclosure outweighs the harm to the protected interests.
Right to Information Act_3
i. the particulars of its organization, functions and duties;
ii. the powers and duties of its officers and employees;
iii. the procedure followed in its decision making process, including channels of supervision and accountability;
iv. the norms set by it for the discharge of its functions;
v. the rules, regulations, instructions, manuals and records used by its employees for discharging its functions;
vi. a statement of the categories of the documents held by it or under its control;
vii. the particulars of any arrangement that exists for consultation with, or representation by the members of the public, in relation to the formulation of policy or implementation thereof;
viii. a statement of the boards, councils, committees and other bodies consisting of two or more persons constituted by it. Additionally, information as to whether the meetings of these are open to the public, or the minutes' of such meetings are accessible to the public;
ix. a directory of its officers and employees;
x. the monthly remuneration received by each of its officers and employees, including the system of compensation as provided in its regulations;
xi. the budget allocated to each of its agency, indicating the particulars of all plans, proposed expenditures and reports on disbursements made;
xii. the manner of execution of subsidy programmes, including the amounts allocated and the details and beneficiaries of such programmes;
xiii. particulars of recipients of concessions, permits or authorizations granted by it;
xiv. details of the information available to, or held by it, reduced in an electronic form;
xv. the particulars of facilities available to citizens for obtaining information, including the working hours of a library or reading room, if maintained for public use;
xvi. the names, designations and other particulars of the Public Information Officers.[S.4(1)(b)]
Right to Information Act_2
inspect works, documents, records.
take notes, extracts or certified copies of documents or records.
take certified samples of material.
obtain information in form of printouts, diskettes, floppies, tapes, video cassettes or in any other electronic mode or through printouts.[S.2(j)]
Right to Information Act_1
Saturday, January 24, 2009
Consumer Protection Act_Practical Problems_14
Consumer Protection Act_Practical Problems_13
FEMA_Practical Problems_11
the following :
(ii) Mozart Ltd., an Indian company, after winning the bid, intends to approach the authorised dealer for remittances towards acquisition of the foreign company.
(iii) A mutual fund, registered in India, is interested to invest in the rated bonds of a listed overseas company which has shareholding of 5% in a listed Indian company.
Competition Act_Practical Problems_3
Competition Act_Practical Problems_2
Competition Act_Practical Problems_1
Friday, January 23, 2009
Companies Act_Practical Problems_50
Lalit, a director of Rich Look Ltd., is seeking re-election at the company’s AGM. While the chairman puts the resolution for Lalit’s re-appointment, which has been duly proposed and seconded, to vote, two shareholders point out to the chairman that Lalit is disqualified to act as director since Padma Ltd., of which Lalit is also a director, has failed to repay its depositors for the past 3 years and the default continues.
Companies Act_Practical Problems_49
Companies Act_Practical Problems_48
At the AGM of Azad Ltd., Raghav, the managing director, is to be re-appointed for a fresh term of 5 years; however, the managing director is not able to make it to the AGM as his flight is cancelled.
Companies Act_Practical Problems_47
A 100% subsidiary of a public company, having a paid-up capital of Rs.10 crore, is unable to get a qualified Company Secretary; however, the managing director of the subsidiary is a qualified Company Secretary and a fellow member of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India.
Monday, January 19, 2009
Companies Act_Practical Problems_46
Reserves and surplus 35 crore
Reserve for redemption of debentures 15 crore
Capital reserves 5 crore
— Loan to GHI Ltd. : Rs.12 crore.
— Guarantee given on behalf of JKL Ltd. : Rs.11 crore.
Companies Act_Practical Problems_45
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
Practical Problems_Factories Act_1
Consumer Protection Act_Practical Problems_12
Consumer Protection Act_Practical Problems_11
Practical problems_Copy right Act_1
(i) Reproduction of a musical work by a teacher in the course of instructions to students.
(ii) Reproduction for research of an unpublished work kept in a public library.
(iii) Making a dozen copies of a book borrowed from a library when such book is available in the market.
(iv) Reproduction in a periodical of a write-up by an expert on a social subject of which the author has expressly retained his copyright.
FEMA_Practical problems_10
(i) Mehta Chemicals Ltd., a listed Indian company, is interested in investing in the shares of an overseas company.
(ii) Jai Capital Ltd. desires to export plant and machinery from India towards equity contribution in a joint-venture in Trinidad and Tobago.
(iii) Arora & Co., a proprietary concern in India, wants to apply to authorities concerned for permission to accept shares of a company outside India in lieu of fees due to it for professional services rendered to the said company.
Friday, January 09, 2009
Companies Act_Practical Problems_44
Rs.
Profit during a year 20.0 lakh
Depreciation 7.5 lakh
Depreciation for previous year not provided 8.0 lakh
General reserve 10.0 lakh
Investment allowance reserve 5.0 lakh
Paid-up share capital 50.0 lakh Determine the maximum amount of dividend the company may declare.
Monday, January 05, 2009
Companies Act_Practical Problems_43
Paid-up share capital Rs. 500 lakh
Share premium account Rs. 100 lakh
General reserves Rs. 800 lakh
Secured loans Rs. 500 lakh
Unsecured loans Rs. 400 lakh
The company plans to buy-back its shares. Compute the maximum limit upto which the company can buy-back its shares.
Companies Act_Practical Problems_42
Paid-up capital Rs. 10 crore.
Reserves and surplus Rs. 20 crore.
Reserves for redemption of debentures Rs. 5 crore.
The company has already advanced to the following companies :
XYZ Ltd. — Rs. 6 crore.
MNO Ltd. — Rs. 2 crore.
ABC Ltd. has given corporate guarantee of Rs. 5 crore to STU Ltd.
PQR Ltd. has approached ABC Ltd. for inter-corporate loan of Rs. 8 crore.
As the Company Secretary of ABC Ltd., advise the management on the limits of making loans and inter-corporate investments.
Companies Act_Practical Problems_41
Companies Act_Practical Problems_40
Saturday, January 03, 2009
Practical Problems_Sales of goods Act_3
Practical Problems_Partnership Act_9
Practical Problems_Sales of Goods Act_2
Ajoy finds a mobile phone lying on a table in a Coffee House. He hands over the mobile phone to Bijoy, the manager of the Coffee House, so that the true owner can claim it back. However, no one claims the mobile phone. After sometime, Ajoy goes to Bijoy, the manager, and requests him to return the mobile phone to him. On Bijoy’s refusal, Ajoy files a suit against him for recovery of the mobile phone. Will Ajoy succeed ? Give reasons.
Friday, January 02, 2009
Practical Problems_Contract Act_92
operational. Can Mohan recover his camera ?
NI Act_Practical Problems_57
Practical Problems_Partnership Act_8
Thursday, January 01, 2009
Companies Act_Practical Problems_39
Companies Act_Practical Problems_38
(i) Whether the contention of shareholders against the non-compliance of their wishes by the directors is tenable.
(ii) Can shareholders usurp the powers which by the articles are vested in the directors by passing a resolution in the general meeting?